|
Post by TFE on Jan 14, 2008 21:15:41 GMT -8
I made the thread! It's my debate, my thread, . . .! This does not give you the right to go however far off topic you want. That being said, I really don't think you're that far off topic. In fact, you were responding to Waldo, hence following the natural flow of the debate (although not in the other thread, I'll say; Waldo was right, there). To be fair, I disagree with a lot of what you say (but not all, by any means), and Jango and Ulan just have a bone to pick, so to speak (although that's being generous). If I had my mod powers, I'd tell them to back off, but since I don't, I can only get mildly confrontational with Ulan, since he's just a member.
|
|
|
Post by Jango Reiss on Jan 14, 2008 22:35:30 GMT -8
I made the thread! It's my debate, my thread I imagined this, only with him jumping up and down and screaming/crying.
|
|
|
Post by Mel Ardran on Jan 17, 2008 10:41:21 GMT -8
Well isn't it? The poster should have choice in what he posts (within reason)...
*goes to change the title*
|
|
|
Post by Laryn En'faal on Jan 17, 2008 12:31:16 GMT -8
Well isn't it? The poster should have choice in what he posts (within reason)... *goes to change the title* -_- Just because you can do something doesn't mean you should. I can use my mod powers to get your email addy and send dozens rude angry emails. Nothing to stop me. Except for a little thing called decency. Odd, I thought he taught us to help other people see the way to salvation; not to scare them to hell in the most literal sense o.O... Okay, now I'm out of here. I have actual important stuff to be doing with my time...
|
|
|
Post by Mel Ardran on Jan 17, 2008 19:23:30 GMT -8
1 Corinthians 15: 39: All flesh is not the same flesh: but there is one kind of flesh of men, another flesh of beasts, another of fishes, and another of birds.
There is human skin, there is beastly fir, there is fishy scales, there is birdlike feathers. All of them are not the same. Take it as it is, add nothing to it, take nothing away.
|
|
|
Post by Jango Reiss on Jan 17, 2008 22:34:38 GMT -8
There is human skin, there is beastly fir, there is fishy scales, there is birdlike feathers. All of them are not the same. Take it as it is, add nothing to it, take nothing away. Most obvious statement of the decade. Also: Fir :B Also Also: Feathers don't exist on anything that's not a bird.
|
|
|
Post by Mel Ardran on Jan 18, 2008 17:32:07 GMT -8
... you would think so...
|
|
|
Post by Jango Reiss on Jan 18, 2008 20:17:45 GMT -8
This thread keeps getting better and better.
|
|
|
Post by jmcmatt on Jan 18, 2008 20:22:02 GMT -8
This isn't directed at anyone in particular, but generally it's a good idea to pause before you post and think, "Does this contribute to the discussion, or benefit anyone in any way?"
If it isn't immediately answerable, you probably shouldn't post.
|
|
|
Post by Jango Reiss on Jan 18, 2008 20:35:26 GMT -8
This isn't directed at anyone in particular, but generally it's a good idea to pause before you post and think, "Does this contribute to the discussion, or benefit anyone in any way?" If it isn't immediately answerable, you probably shouldn't post. Backseat Mod.
|
|
|
Post by Mel Ardran on Jan 20, 2008 13:29:19 GMT -8
My point is, in the Bible it says that each type (human, beast, fish, birds) has it's own flesh. It also says that they have their own flesh and they are not the same? Then how come in evolution one flesh can become another flesh, thus destroying that verse by having flesh becoming another?
Evolution is unbiblical and it doesn't take a rocket scientist to figure out that evolution is way out there!
|
|
|
Post by Jango Reiss on Jan 20, 2008 21:22:44 GMT -8
Or maybe it means that they each have their own flesh, and can't trade it. "Hey, Mom! Billy wants to trade his flesh for mine...can I trade, Mom? Can I? ;D"
|
|
|
Post by TFE on Jan 20, 2008 21:30:16 GMT -8
My point is, in the Bible it says that each type (human, beast, fish, birds) has it's own flesh. . . . Then how come in evolution one flesh can become another flesh, thus destroying that verse by having flesh becoming another? I'm betting it's because Evolution doesn't rely on the Bible to try to prove itself. Um... yeah. I'll agree that I think evolution is wrong, however its being "out there" I will not; because, quite frankly, if you don't use the Bible to judge the facts, evolution is at present the only logical idea of where we've come from. You're doing a smashing job of proving your points, man! ;D ;D ;D
|
|
|
Post by Mel Ardran on Jan 21, 2008 7:55:11 GMT -8
Today's logic does not supercede the Bible. God knows everything. He inspired man to write things. It's humanistic to say that today's knowledge from man supercedes God's all-knowing knowledge.
|
|
|
Post by jmcmatt on Jan 21, 2008 8:43:03 GMT -8
Today's logic does not supercede the Bible. God knows everything. He inspired man to write things. It's humanistic to say that today's knowledge from man supercedes God's all-knowing knowledge. Reiterating on what TFE said, that only applies if everyone relies on the Bible to prove themselves. They do not. Looking at it from a different perspective, the Bible seems just as far out there as evolution might. The only difference is that evolution is based in some proveable fact, while the Bible was around before anyone cared about scientific fact.
|
|