|
Post by darthdodo on Aug 26, 2007 19:33:40 GMT -8
This, I find, is a tough question....
on the one hand if you have suddenly become blind, after years of sight, then you would have at witnessed colors and sights and many things of God's creation, then have it suddenly taken away... knowing the things you are now missing! But on the other hand, if you were blind from birth, then you NEVER EVEN KNEW these things!
But on the positive side... if you suddenly became blind after years of sight, then you would've at least gotten to witness it... so you're curiosity would be cured... but rather if you were blind from birth, then you wouldn't even know, meaning it wouldn't be such a bad loose, because you never had it!
|
|
Jacinth Visor
Ungrouped
"I am not just a man vastly lost in this world, lost in a sea of faces." Credits: 8,500
Posts: 789
|
Post by Jacinth Visor on Aug 31, 2007 21:21:21 GMT -8
I'd rather be blind AFTER birth
|
|
|
Post by Jango Reiss on Aug 31, 2007 21:39:54 GMT -8
After. Then I could at least know what stuff looked like.
|
|
Safiya
New Republic
Rhi's ray of sunshine and baby sis
(110,200 credits)
Posts: 21,533
|
Post by Safiya on Sept 2, 2007 7:06:51 GMT -8
I think I'd pick seeing for a few years then being blind, although I think either one would be tough to handle.
|
|
|
Post by Jedi Knight Taeris on Mar 30, 2008 14:18:24 GMT -8
To know the visual beauty of the earth and then have it taken away would be horrific.
|
|