|
Post by darthdodo on Feb 5, 2009 13:03:03 GMT -8
COMЯADES UNITE!
In the wake of yesteяdays яeauthoяization of the schip, it has now come to my attention, comяades that in oяdeя to pay foя this bill we need a million new smokeяs! In oяdeя to pay foя this the tobacco tax will be inc¬яeased, but as well it will still not pay foя this bill. Eveяy state will loose at least $1 million peя yeaя and 17 states would loose more than $10 million a yeaя! Califoяnia (God bless their gay souls), Ohio and Pennsylvania would loose $50 million peя yeaя undeя the Senate bill. To pay foя this, many states would be яequiяed to stop funding education, tяanspoяtation яepaiя just so tax payeяs can pay mo яe to suppoяt the medical field, allowing many poor souls to go in at eveяy cough and sniffle. Isn’t it glorious, comяades? Let me also mention that the amount of smokeяs in the US is steadily decяeasing, so in the futuяe we should have no problem funding the schip. Comяades it has come to my attention that to help ouя all poweяful goveяnment we must aid them in яecяuiting millions of new smokeяs to keep this bill alive in 5 yeaяs! Comяades, unite so we can keep this bill alive, so that we can make healthcare moяe nationalized and socialized! Foя this is ouя only hope to continue ouя newly begun яevolution foя communism! Foяget that it is dying in eveяy countяy in the woяld that it is tяied and that it is taking the millions of masses along with it to death, we must allow ouяselves to look past ouя feeble capitalist mindset and embяace our new eяa. Let us truly, in the woяds of Pяemieя Baяack Hussein Obama, begin again “the woяk of яemaking Ameяica!”What the heck is going on, people!? Is anybody actually watching the news, or has the government brain washed everybody!? I encourage everybody to read what the European Socialist Act of 2009 (AKA Stimulus Bill) actually has in it! Every week Obama is nationalizing every for of public service, starting with the banks!
|
|
|
Post by Nathan Jey'Daan on Feb 5, 2009 13:16:24 GMT -8
Well, I must confess. I never quite imagined you would stoop this low. Respectful disagreement with the actions of our president is one thing, but your signature and post go way, way beyond that. Tell you what. I'll give you a couple hours to get back in line, or I'm banning you. До свидание, ComЯade. Simple as that.
...Oh, and "Califoяnia (God bless their gay souls)"...?
No wonder everyone hates Christians.
|
|
|
Post by darthdodo on Feb 5, 2009 13:18:45 GMT -8
Because we're in the land of the free, where no one is allowed to disagree with a leader who is leading the country away from it's roots? <_<
|
|
|
Post by Nathan Jey'Daan on Feb 5, 2009 13:21:04 GMT -8
Was that actually supposed to be in response to something I said? Because it makes no sense in context.
|
|
|
Post by TFE on Feb 5, 2009 13:21:31 GMT -8
Because we'Яe in the land of the fЯee, wheЯe no one is allowed to disagЯee with a leadeЯ who is leading the countЯy away fЯom it's Яoots? <_<
|
|
|
Post by darthdodo on Feb 5, 2009 13:21:36 GMT -8
Amendment 1 - Freedom of Religion, Press, Expression. Ratified 12/15/1791. Note Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances. I am exercising my right to free speech without bringing physical harm to our Premier. Now if I was calling everyone to take arms against him than that's quite something different. But I am not, nor do I beleive in killing the man. If you ban me for outspeaking against our leader, no matter how "far" as long as I do not bring physical harm, then you will be going against our constitution and agreeing with the militarianistic rulers of every other soviet country who beleive in shutting up the "insurgents".
|
|
|
Post by TFE on Feb 5, 2009 13:24:52 GMT -8
You do more or less meet all of the definitions of slander, however.
|
|
|
Post by darthdodo on Feb 5, 2009 13:26:19 GMT -8
Even if it was slander, would that go against the constitution? By all means every single Democrat did so against Bush. This wasn't slander. It was just I stating what Obama signed and did, and doing it in such a way to pretend to be happy for it. I will say I did change his name from President to Premier... but, I mean, come on, Ted Kennedy called him Osama by accident...
|
|
|
Post by Nathan Jey'Daan on Feb 5, 2009 13:27:07 GMT -8
This applies to America. This is not America, this is the Internet. Quite frankly, the American constitution does not apply here. I can ban you, and not suffer any consequences for it. And don't bother telling me you'll go to Proboards staff and get the site suspended or whatever. In fact, I can tell you exactly what they'll say if you go complain and say I unfairly banned you or whatever. They may apologize on my behalf, they may tell you that you're welcome to create your own board, and they will tell you that as long as I am not breaking the Proboards Terms of Service, I can actually do whatever I want, and they will not interfere.
|
|
|
Post by TFE on Feb 5, 2009 13:27:43 GMT -8
Does slander go against the Constitution? By the letter of the law, no. However, it does go against many other laws that supercede the Constitution in this particular area.
|
|
|
Post by darthdodo on Feb 5, 2009 13:31:20 GMT -8
It's a famous case of just because you can doesn't mean you should.
I said everything I normally would say, except this time I 1: pretended to be enthusiastic, I 2: replaced the "r's" backwards ones and I 3: used comrade a lot. 4: I put a pic in my sig that is unchanged directly from FOX. I posted pictures of Obama that have SU flags around them (modifications I did not make, but if a Dem did it to Bush nobody would say a word... Besides those things I wrote the exact truth, not straying at all. Find one error in what I said.
|
|
|
Post by TFE on Feb 5, 2009 13:32:22 GMT -8
We are not the United Socialist States of America, for starters.
|
|
|
Post by darthdodo on Feb 5, 2009 13:32:59 GMT -8
My red colored paragraph is completely true with what went on yesterday. The regular colored paragraph is my honest opinion.
|
|
|
Post by darthdodo on Feb 5, 2009 13:33:30 GMT -8
We are not the United Socialist States of America, for starters. No... not by name. You're right there.
|
|
|
Post by TFE on Feb 5, 2009 13:33:51 GMT -8
This I know, however: "Find one error in what I said."
Factually, we are not the USSA.
error++;
|
|